| Amending the
Constitution
Reading Assignment:
We the People lessons 23-27
Text pp. 222-224, 233
AMENDING THE CONSTITUTION
homework
The writers of the Constitution realized that, if their work was to last, they would have to provide a way to adapt the document to changes in society. Article V explains how the Constitution can be amended, or changed. Amending the document is not easy and is a two step process: (1) Proposing Amendments, (2) Ratifying Amendments. Each of these steps has two different options. Either option in either step is okay as long as each step takes place.
Proposing Amendments can by done by:
∙
OR
∙
Ratifying Amendments can by done by:
∙
OR
∙
Our Constitution has been amended twenty-seven times. Give a summary of each amendment. The first has been done as an example:
1. Freedom of religion, speech, and the press; the right of assembly and petition
THE BILL OF RIGHTS
homework
A. At the time the U.S. Constitution was written, every state had a bill of rights as part of its constitution. Because many states refused to ratify the national Constitution until a bill of rights was added to it, Congress was quick to attach ten amendments to the Constitution that we refer to as the Bill of Rights. The sentences below describe some citizen concerns in 1781. Complete each sentence with the number of the amendment that addresses the concern.
1. Some citizens feared that rights not guaranteed by the Constitution would be denied them. Amendment _____ is a response to that concern.
2. States feared the national government might disarm state militias. Amendment _____ addresses this fear.
3. Many Americans were afraid the government might jail them if they criticized it, so Amendment _____ was added to the Constitution.
4. Citizens did not want the government to decide how they should practice their religion. Amendment _____ guarantees freedom of religion.
5. The police might search a citizen's home without good reason, citizens feared. Amendment _____ addresses this concern.
B. Many citizens' fears had to do with justice and the courts. Americans wanted fair treatment for people accused of crimes, so Congress proposed the Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth Amendments. Which of these amendments guarantees the following rights? Write the number before each sentence.
_____ 1. A person accused of a serious crime is to be indicted by a grand jury.
_____ 2. Persons accused of crimes have the right to know the charges against them and shall be able to call witnesses in their favor.
_____ 3. An accused person cannot be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
_____ 4. A person cannot be forced to testify against him or herself.
_____ 5. Property cannot be taken from people unless they are fairly paid.
_____ 6. Persons accused of crimes have the right to a speedy and public trial by jury.
_____ 7. A person cannot be tried twice in a national court for the same crime.
_____ 8. A person accused of a crime has the right to have a lawyer.
_____ 9. In disputes over property, either party can insist on a trial by jury.
_____ 10. Cruel and unusual punishment is forbidden.
BILL OF RIGHTS VOCABULARY
homework
Define each term as it is used in the Bill of Rights. Vocabulary terms are arranged by the amendment in which they are used.
Amendment 1
Respecting
Abridging
Petition
Redress of Grievances
Amendment 2
Arms
Infringed
Amendment 3
Quartered
Amendment 4
Secure
Seizure
Warrant
Affirmation
Amendment 5
Capital Crime
Infamous
Indictment
Jeopardy
Compelled
Due Process of Law
Just Compensation
Eminent Domain
Amendment 6
Prosecutions
Impartial
Extradition
Compulsory
Counsel
Amendment 7
Common Law
Amendment 8
Excessive
Amendment 9
Enumeration
Construed
Disparage
Amendment 10
Respectively
AMENDMENTS 11 - 26
homework
The following questions relate to amendments other than those in the Bill of Rights. Read each question and then write the letter of your answer and the number of the applicable amendment in the space.
_____ 1. A Constitutional amendment was necessary to make legal what tax?
a) sales tax b) property tax c) income tax d) inheritance tax
_____ 2. When a candidate gets a majority of a state's popular vote, that candidate gets how much of the state's electoral vote?
a) all b) 3/4 c) 2/3 d) 1/2
_____ 3. What did the Thirteenth Amendment outlaw?
a) school prayer b) the military draft c) sex discrimination d) slavery
_____ 4. The Fifteenth Amendment gave the right to vote to whom?
a) women b) black men c) black women d) eighteen-year-olds
_____ 5. Today, senators are elected by whom?
a) state legislatures b) US House of Rep. c) the people in state d) Electoral College
_____ 6. What was the only amendment to be canceled by another amendment?
a) 21st b) 18th c) 26th d) 12th
_____ 7. Under the rules established by the Twentieth Amendment, in what month does the President take office?
_____ 8. If the office of the vice presidency becomes vacant, who shall nominate a Vice President?
a) President b) Senate c) House of Reps d) Supreme Court
_____ 9. How many times can a President be elected to office?
a) one b) two c) three d) four
_____ 10. What is the only tax to be declared unconstitutional by amendment?
a) poll tax b) income tax c) import tax d) luxury tax
_____ 11. Citizens of other states or foreign countries cannot sue which of the following in national courts?
a) an elector b) a citizen c) a state d) a corporation
_____ 12. The Fourteenth Amendment says that a state shall not take away from any citizen the right to what?
a) pay taxes b) vote c) discriminate d) life, liberty,
or property
_____ 13. To whom does the Nineteenth Amendment give the right to vote?
a) all women b) black women c) black men d) 18-year-olds
_____ 14. The Twenty-third Amendment grants citizens of what place the right to vote?
a) the territories b) Washington, DC c) new states d) Alaska & Hawaii
_____ 15. What group gained voting rights most recently?
a) black women b) black men c) all women d) 18-year-olds
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”
in class
**homework
** 1. Why do you think most states at the time of the American Revolution had established churches and religious tests for public office? ** 2. Why did the Founders think freedom of religion was important? (give a specific example)
3. What are the essential concepts of the establishment clause?
4. What are the essential concepts of the free exercise clause? 5. When could the free exercise and establishment clauses come into conflict? 6. What guidelines did the Supreme Court give in the 1971 case Lemon v. Kurtzman?
Freedom of Religion
homework
Use the Lemon test to decide if you think the laws and actions described here should be declared unconstitutional. Explain your decision in one or two brief sentences.
Your state passes a law allowing your public school principal to post a copy of the Ten Commandments in every classroom.
Your state passes a law that gives parents who send their children to parochial schools a tax deduction for tuition, transportation, and educational materials.
Your state allows your public school’s algebra teacher to spend part of the class day at a church school, giving instruction to students having difficulty with math.
A group of students at your public school request permission to use an empty classroom after regular school hours for a voluntary prayer meeting. The principal refuses to make the classroom available to them.
Your state passes a law allowing local school districts to pay parents for the cost of student transportation to both public schools and private religious schools.
New York City arranged a voluntary program permitting its public schools to release students during school hours to go to off-campus centers to receive religious instruction.
The Colorado State Board of Regents required teachers to begin each school day leading their class in a “non-denominational” prayer written by state officials. Students who did not with to participate were permitted to remain silent or be excused from the classroom.
The city of Pawtucket, Rhode Island, put up a Christmas display that included a Santa Claus house, reindeer pulling Santa’s sleigh, a Christmas tree, a large banner reading “Season’s Greetings,” and a creche with the figures of the Infant Jesus, Mary, Joseph, angels, shepherds, kings and animals.
The state of Wisconsin passed a law requiring parents to send their children to school until age sixteen in order to provide all children with educational opportunities. Parents convicted of violating this law could be fined or imprisoned. Jonas Yoder was a member of an Old Order Amish community in Wisconsin which expected children to leave school after eighth grade and continue their education by working with their parents. The Amish feel that students will be drawn away from traditional religious beliefs and occupations by exposure in high school to science, machines, and modern life-styles. Jonas Yoder was arrested when he kept his fifteen-year-old son home.
“Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government.”
in class
1. Briefly define / explain each freedom of expression:
Speech
Press
Assembly
Petition
2. Freedom of expression is perhaps one of the most contested aspects of the Constitution. The courts have determined that there are circumstances when government can limit these rights. Summarize the Supreme Court’s position and precedent in each of the following cases:
Schenk v. United States
Kovacs v. Cooper
Yates v. United States
Brandenburg v. Ohio
Tinker v. Des Moines
Hazlewood v. Kuhlmeier
Texas v. Johnson
"the freedom of speech"
the 1st amendment
homework
In the late 1960s, the war in Vietnam was a source of major controversy. Some high school students in Des Moines, Iowa, decided to protest the war by wearing black armbands to class. The students were warned that if they wore the armbands they would be suspended. The students wore the armbands anyway and were suspended from school. A lawsuit was brought against the school by the parents of the suspended students. The parents lost in federal district court and again in a United States Court of Appeals. Then the case was heard by the United States Supreme Court. The Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower courts. It said that the wearing of the armbands was “symbolic” free speech and protected by the Constitution. The Court said that the students did not lose their rights when they passed “through the schoolhouse gate.”
1. Find the amendment that protects students’ rights to free speech. Quote the appropriate passage:
2. Why would the Supreme Court get involved in such a minor case? What gave them jurisdiction?
3. Would this decision allow students in another state to conduct similar protests?
4. Do you think any political symbol would be okay to wear in a public school? Explain.
5. Three other Supreme Court cases dealing with the rights of students are listed below. Use library resources to find out what the issues were and the Courts ruling in ONE of them.
Goss v. Lopez
Wood v. Strickland
T.L.O. v. New Jersey
The Rights of Suspects and Individuals Accused of a Crime
“A” homework; “B” in class
A. Look up amendments IV, V, VI, and VIII in your text book. In your own words, list the rights given to suspects and accused persons in each of these amendments.
Amendment IV
1.
2.
3.
4.
Amendment V
1.
2.
3.
4.
Amendment VI
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Amendment VIII
1.
2.
B. Explain the significance and/or define the following terms and concepts:
Warrant
Probable Cause
Adversarial System
Presumption of Innocence
Miranda
Bail
Capital Punishment
Cruel and Unusual
"witness against himself"
the 5th amendment
homework
Every year more than five thousand cases are brought to the Supreme Court. The court chooses to hear approximately two hundred of them. The Justices look beyond the facts of the single case presented to them and ask, “Can we use this case to make a rule of law that can be used in deciding future cases?” The Supreme Court hears cases in which they can interpret the meaning of the Constitution. Read the following case information to see how the Supreme Court interpreted the law, then answer the questions that follow.
In March of 1963, an 18-year-old woman called the police in Phoenix, Arizona. She claimed that she had been kidnapped and assaulted by a man she had never seen before. Ten days later, a 23-year-old Mexican named Ernesto Miranda was arrested. The woman picked him out of a lineup as the man who attacked her. Miranda was then questioned by the police. After two hours, Miranda signed a confession. A statement typed at the top of the confession said that the confession had been made voluntarily. At no time was Miranda assisted by a lawyer. Miranda was found guilty and sentenced to a prison term of 20-30 years. The conviction was upheld in the Arizona Supreme Court, which claimed that Miranda’s rights had not been violated. The U.S. Supreme Court, however, ruled in favor of Miranda. The vote was five to four. The majority said that Miranda’s right ot remain silent under the 5th Amendment had been violated. The justices declared that an attorney would have warned Miranda about the consequences of signing a confession. The confession was, therefore, invalid. In the future, every suspect would have to be told that he or she has a right to remain silent. All future suspects also would have to be told that they have the right to have an attorney present during police questioning.
1. On the basis of what evidence was Miranda convicted?
2. Why was his case appealed to the Supreme Court? What gave them jurisdiction?
3. Read the Fifth Amendment. Quote the section that applies to this case:
4. Read the Sixth Amendment. Quote the section that applies to this case:
5. Which amendment extends Fifth Amendment rights to cases involving a state like Arizona?
6. What did the court’s interpretation of these amendments mean to state and local police?
7. The change of one vote on the Supreme Court would have reversed the court’s decision. Do you think a simple majority is a large enough vote to overturn a trial court and a state supreme court decision?
"have the assistance of counsel" the 6th amendment
homework
The Sixth Amendment to the Constitution states that a defendant in a national court shall “have the assistance of counsel for his defense.” That is, a person must have a lawyer even if he or she is too poor to pay for it. Some time later, the Fourteenth Amendment was added to the Constitution. It says that no state can “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” How has the Court interpreted these amendments?
Betts v. Brady (1942): A man named Betts was accused of robbery in the state of Maryland. He asked the state court to provide a lawyer for him, but the judge refused. The Supreme Court agreed with the Maryland judge. It concluded that “appointment of counsel is not a fundamental right, essential to a fair trial.”
Gideon v. Wainwright (1965): A man named Gideon was convicted in a Florida court of breaking into a pool room in that state. Like Betts, he asked the court to appoint a lawyer, and was refused. In prison, Gideon spent hours studying law books. He then penciled a petition to the Supreme Court. The Court agreed to hear his case and appointed a distinguished lawyer, Abe Fortas, to defend him. This time the court agreed with Gideon’s lawyer who said, “To convict the poor without counsel while we guarantee the right to counsel to those who can afford it is a denial of equal protection of the laws.” The majority of the justices concluded that the Court had been wrong when it decided in the Betts case, and ruled that defendants in state courts must be represented by lawyers.
After reading these brief descriptions of two important Supreme Court cases, decide whether the statements below are TRUE or FALSE. If a statement is false, write a correct statement below it.
T / F 1. Once the Supreme Court has made a ruling in a specific case, the precedent can never be changed.
T / F 2. The justices completely ignored all previous cases when they made the decision in the Gideon case.
T / F 3. In both cases, the Supreme Court justices based their rulings on their interpretation of the Constitution.
T / F 4. Only lawyers with years of education can petition the Supreme Court.
T / F 5. This case demonstrates the Supreme Court’s increased concern for the rights of individual citizens.
EXPANDING THE FRANCHISE
Changes in Voting Rights
in class
A. Define the following words and explain their relevance to voting rights:
suffrage
franchise
poll tax
literacy test
grandfather clause
B. For each amendment, give the reason it was passed and the effects it had. You will need to use the Constitution and also look up events at that time in appropriate sections of your history text.
Fifteenth Nineteenth Twenty-third Twenty-fourth Twenty-sixth
C. Answer the following questions with complete sentences.
1. How do you think the founding fathers justified restrictions on voting rights when they wanted a government to be truly representative? 2. Why do you think that western states were the first to give women the right to vote?SHORT ESSAY: As suffrage expanded and gave everyone eighteen and older the franchise, it seems that voter turnout has decreased. Study the chart below. Which age groups vote more? Which vote less? Why do you think that is the case? What is the difference in turnout in every other election? Why do you think voter turnout is so low in the United States today?
Percentage of Voters
AGE 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984
18 - 20 48.3 20.8 38.0 20.1 35.7 19.8 36.7
21 - 24 50.7 26.4 45.6 26.2 43.1 28.4 43.5
25 - 44 62.7 42.2 58.7 43.1 58.7 45.4 58.4
45 - 64 70.8 56.9 68.7 58.5 69.3 62.2 69.8
65 - over 63.5 51.4 62.2 55.9 65.1 59.9 67.7
THE BILL OF RIGHTS
homework
Read the following hypothetical situations and decide whether each one contains a violation of the Bill of Rights. For each, write "violation" or "no violation" and give the number of the amendment and appropriate phrases from the amendment that relate to the situation.
1. A 20 year old college student starts his own newspaper which often prints articles making fun of the local mayor. They mayor is angry and gets his aides to take the papers off the stands before they can be distributed. 2. A woman is being tried for murder. The prosecuting attorney forces her to testify. 3. A student wears a button to school urging people to vote for a certain candidate for President of the United States. Some other students don't like the candidate and ask the principal to foce the student to take off the button. The principal refuses to tell the student to remove the button. 4. A dentist is being sued $500,000.00. He wants a jury to hear the case but the judge refuses. 5. A young woman is being tried for treason. She is accused of selling plans for building a nuclear warhead to Iran. The judge believes it would be dangerous to let the public hear her ideas. He refuses to allow anyone to view the trial. 6. A group of teenagers gather quietly on a street corner. Neighbors complain and ask the police to arrest them for getting together as a group. The police refuse. 7. A town needs more land to build a new elementary school. A woman's property is needed, but she wants to keep it. The town forces her to sell and gives her twice the property's actual value. She sues to get her land back. 8. The government tries a man for murder and loses the case. A jury says he is innocent. The district attorney who prosecuted the case is mad and promises to keep trying him until they get a jury to convict him. The defendant thinks this is unfair. 9. The Postmaster General of the United States has a cross and a nativity scene installed at all the Post Offices throughout the country during Christmas time. Government funds are being used to purchase the cross and the nativity scene. The mayor of a predominantly Jewish town demands that the cross and nativity scene be removed from her town. 10. A man living on a quiet residential street erects a giant billboard on his front lawn. The billboard has neon lights advertising a new breakfast cereal that the man invented. The city has a zoning law against this type of sign in a residential neighborhood and demands that it be removed.
|